Website review
Inspect mobile usability, page clarity, conversion paths, forms, technical issues, and obvious trust gaps.
Recover reviews the website, organic search visibility, competitors, conversion path, and lead handoff, then ranks the issues that are most worth addressing first.
Inspect mobile usability, page clarity, conversion paths, forms, technical issues, and obvious trust gaps.
Check crawlability, metadata, page intent, internal linking, sitemap and robots basics, and visible content gaps.
Compare useful public positioning and search coverage to identify gaps without copying another company's site.
For local or service-area businesses, check how clearly the website communicates services and markets served.
Follow the path from landing page to inquiry and identify where a visitor may get confused, blocked, or lost.
Separate urgent fixes from optional improvements so the business knows what should happen first.
Website, services, market, and the outcome the owner wants to improve.
Inspect website, search foundations, public competitors, and the lead conversion route.
Rank issues by practical impact and dependency rather than dumping a generic scorecard.
Show what can be fixed in place, what may need a rebuild, and what can wait.
No. It is an entry option for a business that wants evidence before committing. A clear website project can go directly into the $1,497 build scope.
Automated checks can support evidence, but the deliverable should prioritize the actual customer path and useful fixes rather than hiding behind one generic score.
No. It identifies and prioritizes controllable website, search, and conversion problems. Customer volume still depends on demand, competition, authority, sales execution, and time.
Tell Recover what the business sells, what the current website looks like, and what should improve next.
Send project details